Does the activity using technology
substitute for an activity I would normally use?
Low Tech Activity:Brainstorm
in small groups
High Tech Activity: Use
text chat to brainstorm
If so, does it allow my students
to complete that activity in a more satisfactory manner? How?
|
|
|
| Students who don't usually speak up (reflective learners) orally may take an equal part in the discussion through text | Slow or novice typists are penalized; their expression is limited by the effort it takes to use the keyboard |
| Teacher can monitor brainstorming sessions by saving the text: useful for keeping students on topic and making sure they stay in the target language | Diagramming (mind mapping, for example) or sketching is not possible in the chat window (other software maybe employed, however, such as Netscape Conference's Whiteboard) |
| Students can easily save ideas in text form for reporting or recording the group's ideas | Limited in terms of social embeddedness: body language, facial expressions, gestures |
| Students are highly motivated to take part in the text chat; their participation level can be visually assessed and remarked on by themselves, their peers or their teacher | |
| Visual presentation of peer interlanguge may be more easily understood than oral presentation |
Do the potential problems outweigh
the advantages of using the technology?
In this case, I feel that text chat-brainstorming
does help me to meet my goals of learner-centeredness and encouragement
of varied learning styles in the writing course, so I will use it.